Multi Criteria Decision Analysis for Siting and Sizing of Fast Charging Stations along the Prithvi Highway to Ensure Acceptable User Waiting Time.
Student: Prajwal Chirague Niroula
Supervisor: Er. Bishnu Prasad Devkota
Submitted Date:
October, 2026
Abstract
The expansion of Electric Vehicle (EV) infrastructure in Nepal is currently characterized by
an unplanned, market-driven approach, leading to "charging deserts" and significant range
anxiety during intercity travel. This study evaluates the optimal siting and sizing of fast-
charging stations along a 5km buffer of the Prithvi Highway (Kathmandu–Pokhara corridor)
to ensure network reliability and acceptable service levels. A mixed-method approach is
adopted, utilizing a behavioral survey of 391 EV users and a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy
Process (FAHP) involving 20 multidisciplinary experts. QGIS is employed for spatial
suitability mapping and service gap analysis, while queuing theory (M/M/s/N model) is
utilized in MS Excel to determine infrastructure sizing.
The study revealed that proximity to grid infrastructure (29.66%) and traffic volume
(25.17%) are the most critical factors for station siting, while Proximity to POIs
(18.17%),Land Slide Suitability (11.81%) Distance from Existing Stations (8.58%) and
Landslide Susceptibility (6.61%) are influencing factor for station sititng , with the expert
model achieving a mathematically sound Consistency Ratio (CR) of 0.096. Behavioral
analysis identified a 20-minute maximum wait tolerance and a critical anxiety mileage limit
of 58.06 km, suggesting a recommended maximum station spacing of 29 km. Spatial analysis
identified Dhunbesi, Galchhi, and Abu Khaireni as primary "charging deserts" that fail to
meet current service intervals. To maintain the 20-minute wait threshold, it is determined that
high-demand segments require a minimum of 4 charging points (60kW) by 2035 A.D.
It is concluded that the current unplanned infrastructure is insufficient to meet future demand,
particularly in high-risk landslide zones which were masked out for network resilience. It is
recommended that authorities prioritize the identified service gaps and co-locate stations with
existing amenities to maximize user utility. Implementing this integrated siting and sizing
framework will ensure that user wait times remain within acceptable limits.
Keywords
Fast Charging Stations, GIS-based MCDA, Queuing Theory, Fuzzy AHP (FAHP), Range Anxiety, User Waiting time, Service Gap Analysis